Until the 1930s, writes Meghan O'Rourke in Slate.com, a woman jilted by her husband could sue for financial compensation for the damage to her reputation caused by a canceled wedding. These cases were known as "Breach of Promise to Marry" actions. During the 1930s these laws began to be overturned.
As these laws faded away and judges awarded women fewer damages, the diamond ring became a symbol of a man's commitment (financial and otherwise) to marry his fiance. Back then, a woman technically had to be a virgin if she wanted to marry. Many women, however, lost their virginity during their engagement so a financial obligation was important. The "Breach of Promise" actions were a way to prevent what people feared would be a promise-seduce-and-abandon scenario.
Now, however, most women do not consider marriageability (or their virginity) their major asset. Further, most women imagine a marriage where housework, child rearing, and working are equally divided responsibilities. Thus, argues O'Rourke, the ring is really a throw back to antiquated gender roles and an "outmoded commodity." In addition, men do not have to wear a similar sign of commitment before the wedding day. It is telling that in many Scandinavian countries, where gender attitudes are much more egalitarian, that both men and women wear an engagement ring.






Companies See Good Marriages are Good For the Bottom Line
By Wendy Jaffe, Esq.
The Wall Street Journal is reporting that more and more businesses are taking steps to help employees strengthen their marriages.
According to the Journal, "A small but growing number of companies have implemented training programs designed to help employees strengthen their marriages or other personal relatinships. Some companies are motivated by religious values to encourage strong marriages and families. But now, amid evidence that divorce and relationship stress can make workers less efficient, more companies have begun offering marriage training programs with an eye to keeping their businesses running more smoothly and profitably."
So how does divorce and relationship impact the bottom line? "Productivity lost from marriage...stress can cost employers some $6 billion annually, according to an estimate cited in a new report, "Marriage and Family Wellness: Corporate American's Business?" sponsored by the Marrige CoMission, a marriage strengthening advocacy group in Atlanta. Another study cited in the report found that in the year following divorce, employees lost and average of four weeks of work."
Clearly, business is starting to see that investing in marriage will positively impact the bottom line.
June 02, 2007 at 04:13 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)